Cargill v. Ace American Ins. Co.: The Minnesota Supreme Court Reminds Us Of The Value of Every 2-Year-Old’s Favorite Question

4 Wm. Mitchell J. L. & P. 6

By: Chad Snyder[Y]

Why.

That, I learned in one of the more productive hours of my law school experience, is the answer any lawyer should be ready to give in support of any legal argument.[1] And, as one of my fellow students learned the hard way in one of those hard-to-watch Socratic moments, “because another case says so” is not always or even often a good enough  “why.” Common law, by its nature, evolves. So it is not enough to rest on the argument that a court should apply your proposed rule because it happens to be the rule that has been applied before. A lawyer making an argument or, though my professor did not say so, a judge issuing a decision, should be able to articulate a reason the legal rule she advocates should be adopted or maintained, and why it functions better than the alternative or alternatives. Read the rest of this entry »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.